Paging file windows 7 8gb

For example, when the system commit charge is more than 90 percent of the system commit limit, the page file is increased to back it. This continues to occur until the page file reaches three times the size of physical memory or 4 GB, whichever is larger. This all assumes that the logical disk that is hosting the page file is large enough to accommodate the growth. The following table lists the minimum and maximum page file sizes of system-managed page files in Windows 10 and Windows Several performance counters are related to page files.

This section describes the counters and what they measure. The following performance counters measure hard page faults which include, but are not limited to, page file reads :. Hard page faults are faults that must be resolved by retrieving the data from disk. Such data can include portions of DLLs,. These faults might or might not be related to a page file or to a low-memory condition.

Hard page faults are a standard function of the operating system. They occur when the following items are read:. High values for these counters excessive paging indicate disk access of generally 4 KB per page fault on x86 and x64 versions of Windows and Windows Server. This disk access might or might not be related to page file activity but may contribute to poor disk performance that can cause system-wide delays if the related disks are overwhelmed.

Therefore, we recommend that you monitor the disk performance of the logical disks that host a page file in correlation with these counters. Be aware that a system that has a sustained hard page faults per second experiences KB per second disk transfers. No performance counter directly measures which logical disk the hard page faults are resolved for. Not all the memory on the modified page list is written out to disk. If a system is configured to have more than one page files, the page file that responds first is the one that is used.

This means that page files that are on faster disks are used more frequently. Be aware that actual page file usage depends greatly on the amount of modified memory that the system is managing.

This means that files that already exist on disk such as. Only modified data that does not already exist on disk for example, unsaved text in Notepad is memory that could potentially be backed by a page file. After the unsaved data is saved to disk as a file, it is backed by the disk and not by a page file.

Skip to main content. This browser is no longer supported. Download Microsoft Edge More info. So the more RAM you have, the larger the pagefile's default size gets. Of course that info is old, not sure if any of that has changed. Personally I'd just leave it alone, it seems like you'd encounter more mystery issues getting rid of the pagefile. Decrease performance? Where are these benchmarks? I'd like to see them as that only makes sense if Microsoft coded the memory management wrong.

Besides that single claim of a slight performance decrease, there's little point in a pagefile at 8 gigs. One person mentioned kernel dumps need the page file in case of a BSOD or something of that sort. I'm not sure if that's true as that again makes little sense at first glance. One thing you can't do without a pagefile at least the size of your ram is hibernation, since that's where the computer keeps the status of your computer right before hibernation comes into effect.

Most people don't have any use for that feature though. I always disable the page file, and I'm only at 4 gigs. There's two issues with disabling it. Now this makes sense for systems with little Ram, but when it comes to 8 gigs that's at a ton of extra ram.

The second problem is Windows will now not give you any warning at all if you run out of memory, and programs will start crashing. I've had the computer crash a very few times too when that happened, even though it probably shouldn't have if proper memory management practices were followed. It's simply a matter of getting a feel for how you use the computer. I find I'll have to close Chrome if I also have a bunch of standard programs open while I play Starcraft 2, as that sometimes hits the 4 gig limit.

The good thing out of all of this is your computing experience as a result of this should be faster since you'll be forced to avoid hitting the memory limit, which drags your system into using your super-slow harddrive as memory which is just ridiculous these days with lightning fast memory.

It's up to you. You probably won't ever notice a difference at 8 gigs. Personally I like to be on "The Edge" of things and and have my computer be as efficient as possible, even if this efficiency is only theoretical. I once watch a long video presentation on Windows Memory Management from Windows XP to Windows 7, and the creators of the Sysinternals tools specifically stated its best to leave page file be.

Ill update the thread once I find the video but it was on Microsoft website some place, might be difficult actually finding it now but it was back in early February the last time I saw it.

The page file has nothing to do with the hibernation feature. That's what hiberfil. Search In. Interesting thread. Each physical drive benefits from having a PF. But separate partitions on the same drive don't. This is because even with SSDs, data is accessed sequentially, one segment at a time. If multiple chunks of data could be access at the same time on the same drive, then multiple PFs might help.

With multiple physical drives, data from each physical drive can be accessed simultaneously. So PFs on each drive is worth it.

I don't believe you can create a page file per partition on the same drive. The options are per drive, not partition. Joined: Jan 6, Posts: 14, Location: Slovenia. Minimalist , Dec 3, Minimalist Very interesting.

Though it would be pointless to do. Last edited: Dec 3, It would make sense that you could because the OS sees the partitions as separate drives - hence the unique drive letters.

The partition tables are kept on the drive and it is the drive controller that deals with those issues.